Jurisdiction, process, and effective protection of rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64894/62511y20Keywords:
judicial protection , procedural effectiveness , instrumentality of the process , judicial delay , substantive rightsAbstract
A modern conception of the judicial process requires emphasizing the value of 'efficacy' in the jurisdictional function and the instrumental nature of procedural rules, in the sense that their purpose lies in making effective the substantive rights that require protection. Within this framework, measures of the type requested appear as one of the appropriate means, during the course of the trial, to ensure the proper delivery of justice and to avoid the risk of a favorable but ineffective judgment due to delay
Downloads
References
BEKKER, E. (1868). System des heutigen Pandektenrechts. [Sistema del derecho de las Pandectas, obra clave en la crítica a las construcciones ficticias]. Duncker & Humblot.
BRINZ, A. (1873). Lehrbuch der Pandekten [Manual de Pandectas, donde desarrolla su crítica a las ficciones jurídicas]. (2.º ed., Vols. I-II). Ferdinand Enke.
CALAMANDREI, P. (1957). Elogio de los jueces escrito por un abogado. Ediciones Jurídi cas Europa-América.
DWORKIN, R. (1993). Los derechos en serio. Planeta Agostini.
KELSEN, H. (1960). Teoría pura del derecho (2.ª ed.). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
SAVIGNY, F. C. de (1878). Sistema del derecho romano actual. (J. Mesía y M. Poley trad.) F. Góngora y compañía editores
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Luis Alberto Rodríguez Saiach (Autoría)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
