ANNOTATIONS ON THE JURISPRUDENCE THATLIMITS THE STANDING OF STATE ACTORS TO CHALLENGETHE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS

Authors

Keywords:

active legitimacy of the State, constitutional review, jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, challenge of state norms

Abstract

This paper analyzes the jurisprudential doctrine of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, which for over a century has excluded the possibility of recognizing standing to state authorities to challenge the constitutionality of their own regulations. It examines the evolution of
this doctrine through various landmark rulings, the reasoning that supports it, and its limitations in light of the current institutional complexity. Finally, it proposes the need for a review and more detailed regulation of the State's standing to challenge acts and norms, especially in the context of annulment actions and those of a constitutional nature. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Daniel Fernando Soria, Poder Judicial de la provincia de Buenos Aires

    Juez de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Fue profesor de grado y posgrado de Derecho Administrativo, Derecho Urbanístico y Derecho Local (Universidad de Buenos Aires, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Universidad Austral, Universidad Católica Argentina y Universidad Católica de La Plata). Así como en cursos profundizados, entre otros, del Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente y el Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Published

2025-07-04

How to Cite

Soria, D. F. (2025). ANNOTATIONS ON THE JURISPRUDENCE THATLIMITS THE STANDING OF STATE ACTORS TO CHALLENGETHE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS. LEGAL JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST, 4. https://revistajuridica.uno.edu.ar/index.php/revistauno/article/view/75