Annotations on the jurisprudence that limits the standing of state actors to challenge the constitutionality of laws
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64894/fzbgmr05Keywords:
active legitimacy of the State, constitutional review, jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, challenge of state normsAbstract
This paper analyzes the jurisprudential doctrine of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, which for over a century has excluded the possibility of recognizing standing to state authorities to challenge the constitutionality of their own regulations. It examines the evolution of
this doctrine through various landmark rulings, the reasoning that supports it, and its limitations in light of the current institutional complexity. Finally, it proposes the need for a review and more detailed regulation of the State's standing to challenge acts and norms, especially in the context of annulment actions and those of a constitutional nature.
Downloads
References
Bianchi, A. B. (2002). Control de constitucionalidad (2ª ed., Vol. 2). Ábaco.
Imaz, E., & Rey, R. (1962). El recurso extraordinario.
Laplacette, C. J. (2016). Teoría y práctica del control de constitucionalidad (2ª ed.). Nerva. BdeF.
Sagüés, N. P. (1982). Sobre el planteamiento de inconstitucionalidad de las normas, por parte de los órganos del Estado. El Derecho, 66.
Soria, D. F. (2022). Descalificación de normas legislativas dispuestas por la Corte Suprema en vía no judicial. LA LEY, 2022-F, 505. TR LA LEY AR/DOC/3554/2022.
Tribiño, C. (1998a). El Fiscal de Estado. Ábaco.
Tribiño, C. (1998b). El recurso extraordinario ante la Corte Suprema. Ábaco.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Daniel Fernando Soria (Autoría)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
